Boris's Blind Alley

Boris's Blind Alley

The mishandling of the pandemic response by Boris and his government can only be described as disastrous. The string of appalling late responses, misjudgments and random actions has sadly exposed the Prime Minister's leadership as incompetent. For example, whilst the belated first lock down could be justified by extreme caution when faced with a new threat, the second one certainly has no validity in science.

There is another pandemic currently raging through Britain alongside COVID; a pandemic of fear. It is a pandemic Boris has fuelled with his current response and one the press and news agencies perpetuate. 

Image
numbers

As per my Murrination The Second Wave Does Not Require a Lockdown, the overwhelming evidence is that lock downs are not an effective countermeasure to the spread of the virus. On top of this, the resultant economic damage is potentially catastrophic. On the other hand, the herd immunity strategy highlighted by Sweden is one we too should follow due to it's success. Indeed, the evidence seems clear that there is cross-immunity present already in many populations, including the UK, which will limit the spread of the infection.

We must remember this virus is not the Black Plague or Spanish Flu. It is more like a very bad flu with its worst impact on the more susceptible elements of the population. Thus, having seen a mild excess death spike above the average, this next wave should have far less impact than the worst case models predict.

Despite this, Britain and Boris remain in the grip of the delusional and egocentrically driven guidance of Witty and Valence with that most destructive of influences Neil Ferguson in the supporting second row.

To be very clear, Boris is driving the nation into a blind alley by pushing for a second lock down and further acceleration of the economic contraction with untold social consequences. Once more the fear stick has been wielded whilst the rising case numbers already show that the tripwires being used to justify this action are no longer relevant.

Yes, the numbers of infected or those that have had the virus are rising. That is because the test cannot distinguish between the two situations of active and past effects of the virus giving false positives with respect to active infection rates.Meanwhile, the critical care levels and death rates are not related in the same way as the first wave with respect to total the numbers of positive tests as we are testing more than we did in the first wave. So in reality the data is just not comparable.In addition if the infections in this second wave are focussed on the under thirty's and student population, we would expect high infection rates as its sweeps through the group, but very few hospitalisations. A situation we should have been engineering in the summer to raise heard immunity, when due to seasonality coronaviruses are always less virulent.

Meanwhile Witty & Co are arguing there is a lag in death rates versus the positive tests, the evidence will, I suspect, show that in three weeks the infected numbers will be higher than the last peak but that death rates will remain low. 

The scientific, political and collective  delusion of focussing on a few numbers such as infection rates as if they represent the real picture, has to stop and be replaced with real data modelling placed in the context of exceeds deaths that take into account seasonality and similar respiratory types of deaths.If this were to be done, it would be apparent that we are dealing with a virulent and very nasty flue infection, rather than the Spanish flue or black death.

Thus Boris' current strategy based on poor statical modelling, will lead to enormous damage and increased the collective fear of the population as well as the constriction of the economy which will result in horrendous social consequences. This is damage that may well be the final straw that results in Boris being forced from office by his party. Unless Boris can separate himself from the almost inevitable national lock down that the current dominant scientific thought process is leading us too.

A great leader would have altered course away from the Witty and Valence rocks to steer Britain onto a course similar to Sweden's strategy.

Category

 

Subscribe

Engage With David On Social Media

LinkedIn  Twitter  Facebook

Comments

Permalink

David, you said it - as if you foresaw Biden's line in the first debate with Trump:
YOU: "There is another pandemic currently raging through Britain alongside COVID; a pandemic of fear"
BIDEN: " America is infected by more than Covid" (because of you Donald Trump...)
So what have we learned?
Populist governments do not work because:
They are black and white, narcissistic, too radical, divisive etc etc. They have all shown they have no plans, no proper strategies, no proper processes, do not integrate enough specialist knowledge etc
Because of the preceding, they do not develop holistic well thought through strategies and only engage "yes men" (not - or few - women) into their circles?
They are gasping for air because their hard line ideas generally do not wash with the young who will determine the future of our societies (i.e. hardliners are trying to save/maintain what cannot be saved - because the world is changing)
etc...
Which is NOT to promote the opposite: excessive, "revenge seeking" socialism, "overnight greenness" which should - and will - come in time but cannot already tomorrow, the belief that any kind of competition is bad because it creates (wealthier) winners (it is all about degree, not either-or) etc etc

So how do we find a workable and sensible balance? And when will so many people stop thinking that only their own opinions are so good and important and when will they stop bulldozing anyone with a different view?

Sometimes it is hard not to think: "humans will kill humanity before climate change ever has a chance to do so"

Keep at it David

Permalink

Yes sadly Bojo has proven to be as inadequate as May He won't be in office much longer public anger 😡 is rising already

Permalink

David how long do you think Johnson has in Office before as you said his party will remove him, or even the public get fed up with this government